Drawing on oral histories and interviews with prominent figures, Karissa Haugeberg examines American women's fight against abortion. Beginning in the s, she looks at Marjory Mecklenburg's attempt to shift the attention of anti-abortion leaders from the rights of fetuses to the needs of pregnant women. Moving forward she traces the grassroots work of Catholic women, including Juli Loesch and Joan Andrews, and their encounters with the influx of evangelicals into the movement.
She also looks at the activism of evangelical Protestant Shelley Shannon, a prominent pro-life extremist of the s. Throughout, Haugeberg explores important questions such as the ways people fused religious conviction with partisan politics, activists' rationalizations for lethal violence, and how women claimed space within an unshakably patriarchal movement. A balanced treatment of an explosive topic, Women against Abortion is an overdue portrait of the foot soldiers behind a potent American cause. S26 Protested at rallies and politicized in party platforms, terminating pregnancy is often characterized as a selfish decision by women who put their own interests above those of the fetus.
This background of stigma and hostility has stifled women's willingness to talk about abortion, which in turn distorts public and political discussion. To pry open the silence surrounding this public issue, Sanger distinguishes between abortion privacy, a form of nondisclosure based on a woman's desire to control personal information, and abortion secrecy, a woman's defense against the many harms of disclosure. Laws regulating abortion patients and providers treat abortion not as an acceptable medical decision--let alone a right--but as something disreputable, immoral, and chosen by mistake.
Exploiting the emotional power of fetal imagery, laws require women to undergo ultrasound, a practice welcomed in wanted pregnancies but commandeered for use against women with unwanted pregnancies. Sanger takes these prejudicial views of women's abortion decisions into the twenty-first century by uncovering new connections between abortion law and American culture and politics. New medical technologies, women's increasing willingness to talk online and off, and the prospect of tighter judicial reins on state legislatures are shaking up the practice of abortion.
As talk becomes more transparent and acceptable, women's decisions about whether or not to become mothers will be treated more like those of other adults making significant personal choices.
For each topic, the current medical evidence is followed by a detailed discussion of the ethical issues involved. A non-partisan group.
American Psychological Association Topics: Abortion Includes news and articles from this perspective. Look at the right side menus as well. Our mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations.
Teenage Pregnancy Prevention: Statistics and Programs.
Polling Report on Abortion and Birth Control the most up-to-date results from various good polls. Atla Catholic Periodical and Literature Index Indexing of periodicals, essay collections, church documents, papal documents and electronic resources expressly addressing the practice and intellectual tradition of Roman Catholicism. You could be a teen, a victim of rape, a one night stand, it could be a multitude of reasons. You think to yourself, should I terminate this pregnancy to make my life easier. This is a question many women have with themselves or even a friend or family member.
Abortion has been around for centuries, it even dates back to the BC era, but just recently during the 19th century abortion became a huge social and moral issue With abortion illegal, it would affect the well-being and rights of many women. Abortion should be kept legal in the United States because it is a personal and private decision.
According to our ninth and fourteenth amendments, we have a right to privacy. Better Essays words 1. It is a woman's right to choose what she does with her body, and it should not be altered or influenced by anyone else.
This right is guaranteed by the ninth amendment, which contains the right to privacy. The ninth amendment states: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Free Essays words 4. Most would say that someone who has a more liberal view of the world is pro choice and someone who is more conservative is pro life. Although there may prove to be a correlation between political view and view on abortion, there are people in this world on both sides of the issue. Michael Dukakis, in contrast, would probably nominate judges who agree with the octogenarian Justices Brennan, Marshall and Blackmun.
That's because he's a civil libertarian, as am I; most of us, though not all, prefer to leave the early decision on childbearing to the pregnant woman. Although ''civil liberty'' is being treated as a pair of dirty words by the Bush campaign, on the abortion issue it is the civil libertarians who are in the mainstream.
Women, who will decide this election, prefer to stick with Roe v. Wade by 2 to 1. The trouble with arguing this issue in terms of crime and punishment is that it is being overtaken by scientific events.
In those countries, that reinforces the notion that abortion is just another form of birth control. It's hard to be practical on a moral issue that to many is a unwarranted and unconscionable interference with a woman's most private decision, or b murder, plain and simple. But let's face it: The development of an abortion pill will remove law and its enforcement from the debate.
The ''abortionist'' will be in a bottle. No matter how tight the restrictions or high the price, the market will be served: in early pregnancy, the abortion option will become as easily available as a handgun. Another practical matter: Even if the Court reverses Roe v. Wade and returns the matter to ''local option,'' localities differ.