Marie Antoinette was a queen that ruled with a powerful, wealthy, fist. Throughout her rule over France, Marie Antoinette was kept under a light of ignorance by the people, and therefore, should not be blamed for their suffering, the. Marie Antoinette Essay Words 3 Pages. Because here parents came from two countries at war with each other, their marriage formed a peace treaty.
Marie was very spoiled and grew up with an extravagant lifestyle. She herself became the wife of the next heir to the French throne to further keep the peace.
The heir was Louis XVI, who was a very dull and unsociable person. She was the opposite. She was beautiful, vivacious and bent on pleasure.
The Historical Essays on the Life of Marie–Antoinette of Austria, first published in and immediately suppressed by the royal censors, was republished. Marie Antoinette is one of the most controversial women in history. Her life has inspired many fiction novels, movies, biographies and much.
She became very insensitive to the plight of poor people. When she was queen, her spending only aggravated the difficult economic crisis of the …show more content…. Whether or not she really said this, the truth of the matter was that this story portrayed the way she really thought. She was either completely naive about the problems of the common people, or she thought that they were of no value.
People were dying of starvation and most of the people were blaming it on the Queen Mari Antquonette. On Oct, 5 during the French revolution, thousands of people marched from Paris to Versailles The Palace to present there food demands to the king. They some how forced the royal family to come with them back to Paris. After spending months in the Parisian Palace as prisoners, the Queen and King tried to escape to the eastern border.
Unfortunately, they did not make it.
They were recognized and forced back. On August 10, , revolutionaries stormed the Palace of Tuileries and killed all of the Swiss Guards. The Royal family was imprisoned. Marie Antoinette is very famous, but not for any good deeds. She is well known for her selfishness and self indulgence. This story shows that even powerful royalty is useless without followers. Consequently, by the time Norma Shearer completed Marie Antoinette, she had to make the queen a benevolent character.
Looking for essay on art and design? Let's see if we can help you!
Instead, Norma chose to present Marie as a victim of being at the wrong place at the wrong time. After the matter went public, Marie sought a scapegoat in Rohan; nevertheless, the Paris Parliament acquitted him of any wrongdoing indicating that, Marie was involved in the Diamond Affair. In the film, Norma uses romantic fiction to lighten the court intrigues that resulted from this spendthrift contestation.
Norman introduces Count Fersen and the nefarious Duke Philippe to cover up this issue. In reality, Phillipe was executed after the Diamond Necklace Affair while in the film; he appears as an adored figure.
Many believe that opposite personalities make a great match; in the case of Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI this common idea is proven false. Her frivolousness also contributed to the decline of her reputation. Despite the work of other great scientists, namely Antoine Becquerel, Marie Curie proved to be the greatest scientist in European history by earning many awards, becoming the first female scientist, and assisting in the discovery of the X- Ray Women Scientists: Marie Curie - Marie Curie is widely regarded as a talented scientist whose work has changed the world. Gia Marie Carangi's Life - Human sexuality is a motivation. Anna Maria Luisa, Electress Palatine. Her husband, like many other Haitian men is unemployed.
In the film, Norma barely glimpses the tumultuous trial that Marie went through. Norma deliberately distorted many historical truths to comply with the Hayes Office requirements of exempting anything vile and tawdry in filming industry of that time.
This is a propaganda film. Norma Shearer is trying to sway the audience to a particular way of political thinking. If her sole aim were to explore the life of Marie Antoinette, she would have observed the truths without caring what the Hayes Office and the Catholic League of Decency called for. If anything, Norma only risked declining popularity in motion picture entertainment.
Norma wanted to sway the audience into thinking that Marie Antoinette was a benevolent Queen void of common human errors. What explains the conspicuous light treatment given to the trials that Marie and her husband faced?
Norma could not propagate her propaganda sufficiently without introducing some damaging political stereotypes. People would expect a Queen to be the best mother, wife and a friend of many. With the full knowledge of these stereotypes, Norma intended to give the audience what it expected.
In reality, Marie Antoinette was a terrible mother, the worst wife and a foe to many. As aforementioned, Marie in the film appears as the best mother, wife and a benevolent woman who loves all and hates none. Regrettably, this stereotype is damaging as history lovers are quick to point out the distorted historical facts. Parallels between the historical events and people depicted in the movie and the happenings in contemporary society stand out conspicuously.
In Swaziland where King Mswati perpetuates the monarchial system of governance, teenage queens are common. Similarly, the death of King Louis XVI through execution parallels that of Sadam Hussein who walked the same road in the modern society. Prominent people have been forced to step down from their leadership positions to pave way for further investigations into corruption deals or office abuses. Regrettably, only few leaders are willing to step down for further investigations; majority prefer to cling to power even when evidence dictate that they step down. Coppola made numerous changes in Marie Antoinette perhaps to suit a younger audience in the contemporary times.